‘Micrographia’ inspires artists and creative writers

I know that many scientists are fascinated by Micrographia, but to me it has always seemed like a book with a much broader appeal. Hooke’s simple but evocative language, and his beautiful, intricate illustrations, must have been deliberately chosen to appeal to an audience beyond the small group of experimental philosophers in Restoration London. For a long time I’ve wanted to find out how contemporary writers and artists might respond to Micrographia, and whether they would find anything there to inspire their creative practice. Now, I’ve finally had the opportunity to do this – and it seems as though the answer is yes they do!

21 July 2104 Stuart and Anne-Marie1Thanks to the University of Exeter’s Catalyst seed fund and the Exeter Cathedral Library, I was able to run two half-day workshops bringing artists and creative writers together to see an original copy of Micrographia, do some microscopy, and reflect on these experiences in their art or writing. I was really lucky to be able to recruit some fantastic collaborators to help present the workshops: the artist Amy Shelton and poet Matthew Francis, my colleagues Katie Solomon and Mark Ramsdale from the School of Biosciences at the University of Exeter, and very importantly, Ann Barwood and Stuart MacWilliam from the Exeter Cathedral Library. Ann and Stuart allowed us to have Micrographia in the room with us all day, giving people plenty of time to read the text and look at the amazing illustrations up close.

Selection of antique microscope slidesKatie and Mark provided a range of microscopes, including a Victorian child’s toy microscope similar to the instrument that Hooke originally used. They also brought along a collection of prepared slides, probably late Victorian – these were beautiful objects in themselves, but seen through the microscopes they really demonstrated the amazing variety and intricacy of natural structures.

Most of the workshop participants had little previous experience of microscopy (some of the women explained that although their brothers had had microscopes as children they had not been allowed to touch them!). I think everyone felt something of Hooke’s sense of excitement in seeing things for the first time – a dragon-fly’s wing, an ant, fish scales.

21 July 2014 Fiona Benson1

In the morning Matthew Francis led the writers in a couple of exercises, the first using syllabic verse, the second responding to a section of Hooke’s text. This Micrographia extract (on the ‘small, Silver-colour’d Book-worm’, or silver-fish), when re-lineated and truncated, appeared to be a poem in its own right, such is the richness of Hooke’s language and imagery. I was interested to see the range of responses from the writers, some choosing to focus on the things they had observed through microscopes, others reflecting on the act of seeing, or the contrast between human and microscopic scale. (Poet Alwyn Marriage has blogged about her experience here.)

21 July 2014 Tabatha and Anne-MarieIn the afternoon, Amy Shelton gave the artists free rein and there were some beautiful sketches developed as well as wide-ranging conversation about Hooke, Micrographia and the microscopic specimens. I think all the participants, artists and writers, could happily have spent twice as long looking at the slides and thinking about how to interpret or represent them.

I had some really great feedback after the event and it sounds as though quite a few people are keen to take the work they started on the day further. I’m looking forward to seeing it!


21 July 2014 Alice and Shelley

Finally, I’d like to say a huge and very sincere ‘thank-you’ to everyone who helped to make these workshops a success: Ann Barlow, Helen Featherstone, Jane Feaver, Matthew Francis, Stuart MacWilliam, Mark Ramsdale, Amy Shelton, Katie Solomon, Grace Williams.

5 thoughts on “‘Micrographia’ inspires artists and creative writers

  1. Wondeful idea! This is a brilliant example of how to explore all the ways non-historians can engage with (and be inspired by) historical objects and texts. I suppose the question, then, is whether seeing all these different responses changed how you – as a researcher – look at Micrographia?

    • Thanks – and yes I realise I didn’t write anything about how this influenced my understanding of Micrographia, but of course this was part of what I hoped to get out of the workshops. One of the artists made some really interesting comments about the idea of translation, in terms of the various translations of ideas and images between Hooke, engravers, printers and readers. I’d like to follow up on this, particularly because it resonates with some research I’m starting on translation of scientific texts in the early-modern period. I’m also planning to follow up with participants in a couple of months’ time to see whether they’ve had further thoughts – it’s often hard to formulate responses to things on the spur of the moment, and this was the first time any of them had seen the book.

  2. Pingback: Whewell’s Gazette: Vol. 6 | Whewell's Ghost

  3. Pingback: Whewell’s Gazette: Vol. 7 | Whewell's Ghost

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s